In her first broadcast interview since joining the nation’s highest court, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson talks Donald Trump’s presidential immunity case, an enforceable code of ethics for her and her colleagues, and how the last two years on the bench have gone as the first ever Black woman to serve as a United States Supreme Court justice. Since joining the court, CBS Evening News anchor and managing editor Norah O’Donnell pointed out, Jackson has been a keen questioner. “You immediately became the most prolific questioner among the justices,” O’Donnell said. “No one else is even close to you.” Jackson smiled. “Why do you laugh?” the anchor asked.

“I was always asking questions, and I was always looking for the truth.”

This statement by Judge Jackson highlights her commitment to truth and justice. It also reveals her dedication to seeking clarity and understanding through rigorous questioning. This approach, she believes, is essential for achieving a fair and impartial outcome in any legal proceeding. The judge’s commitment to truth and justice is further exemplified by her dedication to ensuring that all parties involved in a case have a fair chance to be heard.

This plan, titled “The American Rescue Plan,” aimed to address the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic. The plan focused on providing direct financial assistance to individuals and families, bolstering the healthcare system, and stimulating the economy. The American Rescue Plan was a significant piece of legislation that aimed to provide relief to Americans struggling with the economic consequences of the pandemic.

Justice Jackson wrote a scathing dissent in the immunity case, which ruled that former presidents have “absolute” protection from criminal prosecution for “official” actions done while in office. “The majority of my colleagues seems to have put their trust in our Court’s ability to prevent Presidents from becoming Kings through case-by-case application of the indeterminate standards of their new Presidential accountability paradigm,” she wrote. “I fear that they are wrong. But, for all our sakes, I hope that they are right.” When O’Donnell asked Jackson about this case, the justice responded, “I was concerned about a system that appeared to provide immunity for one individual under one set of circumstances. When we have a criminal justice system that had, ordinarily, treated everyone the same.”

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. It is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and resolving legal disputes between states. The Court has the power to declare laws unconstitutional, which can have a significant impact on the outcome of elections. The Supreme Court’s involvement in elections is not new.

“I’m not going to comment on other justice’s interpretation of the rules or what they’re doing,” Jackson said during the CBS interview. In November, all nine justices signed onto the court’s first formal code of conduct governing the ethical behavior of its members, but that agreement doesn’t appear to have a clear enforcement mechanism. When asked about her personal code, Jackson responded, “I follow the rules, whatever they are with respect to ethical obligations, and it’s important, in my view, to do so. It really boils down to impartiality—that’s what the rules are about. People are entitled to know if you’re accepting gifts as a judge, so that they can evaluate whether or not your opinions are impartial.”