You are currently viewing Can AI Help Us Travel More Sustainably?
Representation image: This image is an artistic interpretation related to the article theme.

Can AI Help Us Travel More Sustainably?

As a child, I would spin and spin a toy globe in my room, dreaming of far-off adventures. Now, as an adult, I’m aware of the environmental cost of traveling. But with the rise of sustainable travel, I wondered: Can tech – and more specifically, AI – help us travel more sustainably?

To find out, I put this idea to the test by using AI chatbots to plan two very different vacations.

The Setup: Two Trips, One Goal

For the experiment, I designed two different travel scenarios and let the chatbots plan the itineraries from there.

  • Trip 1: A week and a half in Seoul, South Korea, flying from Tampa, Florida (where I live). My goals include hiking, art, food and seeing all the major historical monuments, with a budget of $2,000 to $3,000.
  • Trip 2: A wild card. I gave the AI chatbots full creative control to plan the most sustainable tropical vacation possible.

The Seoul Search: Sustainability in the Capital City

I started with the Seoul trip. I was actually supposed to move to Korea post-grad to teach English as a foreign language, but that didn’t work out, thanks to COVID-19. I still haven’t made it to Korea, so it’s at the tippy-top of my bucket list.

Both bots quickly recognized South Korea as a fascinating mix of ancient tradition and high-tech innovation. When I asked how to make my trip eco-friendly, they took two different approaches.

  1. ChatGPT gave me a detailed itinerary, including direct flight suggestions, budget breakdowns, eco-lodging in walkable neighborhoods like Insadong and Hongdae, and sustainable food recommendations, such as local markets and temple cuisine. It also factored in transit cards and local carbon offset programs.
  2. Copilot gave me more surface-level results. It recommended looking into eco-certified hotels or guesthouses, but didn’t recommend specific ones, and most of the itinerary it produced was essentially “just walk around this place.” I did like that the results all linked out to other sources and websites, though, so I could do a deeper dive when researching its recommendations.

The Tropical Wild Card: AI Goes Off the Grid

Now for the fun part. I asked each AI platform to plan the most sustainable tropical trip it could dream up. My only parameters were that I wanted a warm and tropical climate, nature, and an eco-conscious budget.

Copilot recommended Palawan, Philippines – the “last frontier” of the Philippines – and laid out a 10-day trip. I loved the itinerary. I mean, it’s like a dream vacation, so how could I not? But again, the results were pretty brief and lacked specificity.

ChatGPT was again more detailed. It chose Costa Rica’s Osa Peninsula – a place I’d honestly never heard of, but I’m glad I know about now – and outlined an eight-day experience. The suggested itinerary also included information about eco-lodges, permaculture farm tours, and sea turtle conservation, and suggested packing reef-safe sunscreen and DEET-free bug spray.

I fact-checked the suggestions from both chatbots, and nearly everything checked out. Most of the lodges ChatGPT listed are genuinely sustainable, utilizing solar power, composting toilets, and no single-use plastics. The activities Copilot suggested all support local economies, communities, and conservation. Both itineraries were invested in ecotourism, which I appreciated.

But here’s the thing: You can’t take anything at face value. AI chatbots have a history of “hallucinating” wrong answers, meaning they generate false or misleading information and present it as fact. Any search or answer must be fact-checked.

What AI Gets Right and Wrong About Sustainable Travel

Planning with AI has its perks: It saves time, simplifies the research, and pulls in suggestions I never would’ve thought of (looking at you, Osa Peninsula). But AI isn’t perfect. The chatbots occasionally recommended hotels that looked eco-friendly but weren’t certified. Neither platform could consistently tell if a business was truly sustainable or just good at marketing, and neither can book anything for you like a real travel agent can.

Also, AI doesn’t know you. It doesn’t know that you prefer local buses to private tours, or that your idea of a dream vacation involves zero plans and a hammock. You’ll still need to tweak your itinerary to suit your actual personality, not your browser history.

For sustainable travel planning, both ChatGPT and Copilot were helpful tools to jumpstart the trip-planning process. Neither platform can replace a good travel advisor or first-hand knowledge, but they’re decent enough assistants for brainstorming, budgeting, and discovering new ideas.

See also: Chatbots Are Ready to Help in Language Learning. Here’s My Experience

Would I Use AI to Plan My Next Trip?

Maybe, but with caveats. I’d consider using ChatGPT and Copilot again, especially at the early planning stage when I’m besieged with options for travel destinations, but I definitely feel like I could get the same results from a well-traveled friend, travel agent, or travel books like Lonely Planet.

If I did opt to use AI chatbots again in the future, I’d still double-check sustainability claims, compare prices manually, and use traditional sites to book things.

Leave a Reply